Does the Constitution always mean what it says? /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Strauss, David A., author.
Imprint:Chicago, Illinois : Law School, University of Chicago, Feb. 6, 2014.
Description:1 online file (1 audio file) (56 min., 15 sec.) : digital, stereo, MP3.
Language:English
Series:Chicago's best ideas
Chicago's best ideas.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Spoken word recording Audio Streaming Audio
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/9980995
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:University of Chicago. Law School, host institution.
Computer file characteristics:MP3.
Sound characteristics:digital stereo
Digital file characteristics:audio file MP3 128Kbps
Notes:Recorded Feb. 6, 2014, posted May 13, 2014.
Summary:"The U.S. Constitution is "the supreme Law of the Land." Of course some of its provisions are vague and must be interpreted. But when the Constitution says something clearly, we follow it. Don't we? Actually things are not that simple. There are several important examples of clear language in the Constitution that we do not follow. (For an example, look at the first word of the First Amendment.) Sometimes, in fact, it would be essentially unthinkable to follow the most obvious meaning of apparently clear language. These are not just slips of the pen by the Framers of the Constitution. Things are more interesting than that: the Framers made deliberate choices that we do not always accept, even though those choices are reflected in the text. The ways in which we ignore apparently clear language in the Constitution can teach us a lot about how American constitutional law actually works. This talk was recorded on February 26, 2014, as part of the Chicago's Best Ideas Lecture Series."--UChicagoLaw SoundCloud webpage.