|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000nim a2200000 i 4500 |
| 001 |
9863409 |
| 005 |
20161209114030.9 |
| 006 |
m o h |
| 007 |
sz zunnnn|||ne |
| 008 |
140218s2008 ilunnnn o l n eng c |
| 003 |
ICU |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)870677218
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a CGU
|b eng
|e rda
|c CGU
|
| 042 |
|
|
|a pcc
|
| 043 |
|
|
|a n-us---
|
| 049 |
|
|
|a CGUA
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a KF4600
|b .E678 2008
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Epstein, Richard Allen,
|d 1943-,
|e author.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n77013251
|1 http://viaf.org/viaf/108205709
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Richard Epstein on two recent SCOTUS decisions /
|c Richard Epstein.
|
| 256 |
|
|
|a MP3
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a Chicago, Illinois :
|b Law School, University of Chicago,
|c recorded Feb. 21, 2008.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 online file (1 audio file) (9 mins., 36 secs.) :
|b digital, stereo, MP3
|
| 306 |
|
|
|a 000936
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a spoken word
|2 rdacontent
|0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/contentTypes/spw
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a audio
|2 rdamedia
|0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/mediaTypes/s
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|2 rdacarrier
|0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/carriers/cr
|
| 344 |
|
|
|a digital
|g stereo
|2 rda
|
| 347 |
|
|
|a audio file
|b MP3
|f 128Kbps
|2 rda
|
| 500 |
|
|
|a "This talk, which discusses Riegel v. Medtronic, and Rowe v. New Hampshire, was recorded February 21, 2008 at the request of the Federalist Society."--Law School faculty podcast webpage.
|
| 518 |
|
|
|a Recorded Feb. 21, 2008, posted Feb 22, 2008.
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Epstein discusses how these two cases show how idea of pre-emption has become more important since the1937 actions that mandated that "federal government's power is plenary with regard to all matters of economic regulation." In Riegel v. Medtronic, a federal district court held that the Medical Device Amentments prempted the product liablility claim Reigel had filed as the result of injury from one of Medtronic's devices. The Supreme Court agreed with the local court that the pre-emption clause bars state common-law claims that challenge the safety of a device that has received premarket approval from the FDA.. In Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transport Agency, the Supreme Court held that several sections of the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 prempted sections of a statute of Maine that regulated air carriers transportation of tobacco products that required the carrier provide recipient verification and deemed-to-know provisions.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Exclusive and concurrent legislative powers
|z United States.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85046252
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Federal government
|z United States.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2008000835
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Exclusive and concurrent legislative powers.
|2 fast
|0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/fst00917729
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Federal government.
|2 fast
|0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/fst00922333
|
| 651 |
|
7 |
|a United States.
|2 fast
|0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/fst01204155
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a University of Chicago.
|b Law School,
|e host institution.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79060603
|1 http://viaf.org/viaf/127829080
|
| 710 |
2 |
|
|a Federalist Society for Law & Public Policy Studies (U.S.),
|e sponsoring body.
|1 http://viaf.org/viaf/124412358
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://www.law.uchicago.edu/audio/epstein022108
|
| 903 |
|
|
|a HeVa
|
| 929 |
|
|
|a cat
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|i 3829d0c0-aff4-5ec5-8263-31a0615d4e10
|s ed24cea0-4124-5178-b51f-079409a97737
|
| 928 |
|
|
|t Library of Congress classification
|a XXKF4600.E678 2008
|l Online
|c UC-FullText
|u http://www.law.uchicago.edu/audio/epstein022108
|g ebooks
|i 7165911
|
