The extraterritorial application of selected human rights treaties /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Costa, Karen da
Imprint:Leiden ; Boston : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2013.
Description:x, 324 p. ; 25 cm.
Language:English
Series:Graduate institute of international and development studies ; v. 11
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies (Series) ; v. 11.
Subject:
Format: Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/8967885
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9789004228375 (hbk. : alk. paper)
9004228373 (hbk. : alk. paper)
9789004227187 (ebk.)
9004227180 (ebk.)
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (p. [305]-310) and index.
Table of Contents:
  • Introduction
  • 1. Origins of the Current Debate
  • 2. Object and Method of the Present Investigation
  • 3. Are States Bound By Human Rights Treaties When They Operate Abroad?
  • A. Main Arguments Supporting the Territorial Application of Human Rights Treaties
  • B. Main Arguments Supporting the Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties
  • Chapter 1. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
  • Preliminary Considerations on the Interpretation of International Treaties
  • 1. Wording and Origins
  • 2. History of the Proceedings
  • A. Spatial Scope of the Covenant During the Initial Phase (1947-1948)
  • B. Relevant Developments During the Drafting Phase (1949-1954)
  • 1. A Key Provision
  • 2. Drafters' Main Focus of Concern: Guaranteeing Rights to Nationals and Aliens in a State Party's Territory
  • 3. US Amendments to the Jurisdictional Clause
  • a. Analysis of the US Proposal to Include Reference to 'Territory' in the Jurisdictional Clause
  • 4. French Text: 'Competence' Instead of 'Juridiction'
  • 5. The 194th Meeting of the Commission on Human Rights (1950)
  • a. Protection of Nationals/Aliens Within/Outside a State Party's Territory
  • b. Military Occupation as an Exceptional Situation
  • c. Reference to the Reach of Penal Law
  • d. Nature of Rights and Possibility of Ensuring them Abroad
  • e. Different Phrasings Suggested for Article 2(1)
  • 6. The Failed French Attempt to Delete Reference to 'Territory'
  • C. Relevant Developments During the Deliberation Phase (1954-1966)
  • Conclusion: Extraterritoriality in the Preparatory Work of the ICCPR
  • 3. The Jurisdictional Clause of the ICCPR Interpreted by Monitoring Bodies
  • Preliminary Considerations
  • A. Quasi-Judicial Bodies: The Position of the Human Rights Committee
  • 1. Views in Individual Communications
  • a. Petitions Brought by Persons Who Fled the Country Regarding Events Occurred in the Country
  • b. Passport Cases
  • c. Persons Kidnapped by State Agents Operating Abroad
  • 2. General Comments
  • 3. Concluding Observations
  • a. Military Occupation
  • b. Troops Operating Abroad in Situations Other than Military Occupation
  • c. The US Territorial Interpretation of the Covenant
  • B. Judicial Bodies: The Position of the International Court of Justice
  • 1. Wall Advisory Opinion
  • 2. Judgment in the Case of Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo
  • C. Further International Human Rights Mechanisms: UN Special Procedures
  • Conclusion
  • Chapter 2. The Spatial Reach of the European Convention on Human Rights
  • Introduction
  • 1. Wording and Origins of Article 1 ECHR
  • 2. European Commission of Human Rights: 'Authority and Control Over Persons'
  • A. Cases Related to Diplomatic and Consular Authorities
  • B. Cases Involving Arrest or Detention of Persons Abroad
  • C. Further Exercise of Public Powers Abroad
  • D. Cases Involving the Presence of Troops Abroad
  • Conclusion
  • 3. Cases Before the European Court of Human Rights
  • A. Cases before Bankovic
  • 1. Control over Territory
  • 2. Regular Exercise of Public Powers
  • 3. Non-Refoulement Cases
  • Conclusion on the Pre-Bankovic Jurisprudence
  • B. The Bankovic Case
  • 1. Factual Background
  • 2. Parties' Arguments
  • 3. Decision by the Court
  • a. Recourse to the VCLT (1969)
  • 1. Ordinary Meaning of Jurisdiction in Public International Law: Primarily Territorial
  • 2. Subsequent State Practice
  • 3. Confirmation of Results: Travaux PrĂ©paratoires
  • b. Recall of the Jurisprudence of the Court on Extraterritorial Jurisdiction
  • c. Court's Evaluation of the Case at Hand
  • 1. Cause-and-Effect Notion of Jurisdiction
  • 2. Rendering Reference to Jurisdiction in Article 1 Devoid of Any Purpose
  • 3. Limited Airspace Control as Amounting to Jurisdiction: Comparison with the Soering Case
  • 4. Comparable Treaty Provisions and Jurisprudence of Further Human Rights Bodies on the Subject
  • 5. 'Ordre Public' Argument, Avoiding a Regrettable vacuum and the Legal Space of the ECHR
  • 6. Comparison with then Ongoing Cases on Similar Issues
  • 7. Absence of a 'Jurisdictional Link'
  • 8. Further Possible Non-Stated Reasons Influencing the Decision in Bankovic
  • 9. Regional Character of the Convention
  • Conclusion on the Bankovic Case
  • C. First Cases After Bankovic
  • 1. Control Over Persons
  • 2. Control Over Territory
  • 3. Control Over Persons and Control Over an Area
  • Conclusion on the First Cases after Bankovic
  • D. Later Cases After Bankovic
  • 1. Exercise of Public Powers Abroad
  • 2. Effects of Acts Abroad
  • 3. Cases Involving the Presence of Troops Abroad
  • a. Detention of Persons Abroad
  • b. Incidents in UN Neutral Buffer Zone
  • c. Further Military Operations
  • Conclusion
  • Overall Concluding Remarks
  • Chapter 3. The Convention Against Torture
  • 1. A Different Treaty Covering an Absolute Right
  • 2. Extent of States Parties' Obligations
  • A. States' Main Obligation Under the Convention Against Torture
  • B. Preparatory Work of the Convention Against Torture
  • 1. Discussions on Article 2(1) CAT During the Preparatory Work
  • 2. Discussions on Article 16(1) CAT During the Preparatory Work
  • 3. Discussions on Article 3(1) CAT During the Preparatory Work
  • 3. Doubts Raised on the Geographical Extent of Application of the CAT
  • A. The Position of the United Kingdom
  • 1. The Position of the Committee in Relation to the UK
  • 2. The UK Comments on the Recommendations by the Committee
  • 3. Later Developments Regarding the UK
  • B. The Position of the United States
  • 1. The Position of the Committee in Relation to the US
  • 2. The US Comments on the Recommendations by the Committee
  • 3. Later Developments Regarding the US
  • C. The Position of the Committee as Reflected in its Further Practice
  • Conclusion
  • Final Conclusion
  • Bibliography
  • Table of Cases
  • Table of Treaties, Legislation, and Other Relevant Instruments
  • Index