International law : a welfarist approach /

"This paper evaluates international law from a welfarist perspective. Global welfarism requires that international law advance the well being of everyone in the world, and scholars influenced by global welfarism and similar cosmopolitan principles have advocated radical restructuring of interna...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Posner, Eric A., author.
Imprint:[Chicago, Illinois] : Law School, University of Chicago, 2005.
Description:1 online resource (63 pages)
Language:English
Series:John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper ; no. 256 (2d series)
John M. Olin Program in Law & Economics working paper ; 2nd ser., no. 256.
Subject:International law -- Philosophy.
International law -- Moral and ethical aspects.
International law -- Moral and ethical aspects.
International law -- Philosophy.
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/8891793
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Notes:"September 2005."
Includes bibliographical references.
Title from online title page (viewed August 28, 2012).
Summary:"This paper evaluates international law from a welfarist perspective. Global welfarism requires that international law advance the well being of everyone in the world, and scholars influenced by global welfarism and similar cosmopolitan principles have advocated radical restructuring of international law. But global welfarism is subject to several constraints, including (1) heterogeneity of preferences of the world population, which produces the state system; (2) agency costs, which produce imperfect governments; and (3) the problem of collective action. These constraints place limits on what policies motivated by global welfarism can achieve, and explain some broad features of international law that otherwise remain puzzling. These features include the central place of state sovereignty in international law despite the moral arbitrariness of borders; the weakness of multilateral treaties; the limited role of individual liability in international law; the predominantly legislative nature of international institutions and the weakness of executive and judicial institutions; and the absence of redistributive obligations in international law."
LEADER 03359nam a2200433 i 4500
001 8891793
003 ICU
005 20120829111300.0
006 m d
007 cr b||||||||||
008 120829s2005 ilu ob 000 0 eng c
035 |a (OCoLC)808630190 
040 |a CGU  |b eng  |e rda  |c CGU 
042 |a pcc 
049 |a CGUA 
050 4 |a KZ3160.P67  |b I58 2005 
100 1 |a Posner, Eric A.,  |e author.  |1 http://viaf.org/viaf/52616221 
245 1 0 |a International law :  |b a welfarist approach /  |c Eric A. Posner. 
260 |a [Chicago, Illinois] :  |b Law School, University of Chicago,  |c 2005. 
300 |a 1 online resource (63 pages) 
336 |a text  |2 rdacontent  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/contentTypes/txt 
337 |a computer  |2 rdamedia  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/mediaTypes/c 
338 |a online resource  |2 rdacarrier  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/carriers/cr 
490 1 |a John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper ;  |v no. 256 (2d series) 
500 |a "September 2005." 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references. 
520 |a "This paper evaluates international law from a welfarist perspective. Global welfarism requires that international law advance the well being of everyone in the world, and scholars influenced by global welfarism and similar cosmopolitan principles have advocated radical restructuring of international law. But global welfarism is subject to several constraints, including (1) heterogeneity of preferences of the world population, which produces the state system; (2) agency costs, which produce imperfect governments; and (3) the problem of collective action. These constraints place limits on what policies motivated by global welfarism can achieve, and explain some broad features of international law that otherwise remain puzzling. These features include the central place of state sovereignty in international law despite the moral arbitrariness of borders; the weakness of multilateral treaties; the limited role of individual liability in international law; the predominantly legislative nature of international institutions and the weakness of executive and judicial institutions; and the absence of redistributive obligations in international law." 
588 |a Title from online title page (viewed August 28, 2012). 
650 0 |a International law  |x Philosophy.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh85067421 
650 0 |a International law  |x Moral and ethical aspects.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2009127453 
650 7 |a International law  |x Moral and ethical aspects.  |2 fast  |0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/fst00977001 
650 7 |a International law  |x Philosophy.  |2 fast  |0 http://id.worldcat.org/fast/fst00977003 
830 0 |a John M. Olin Program in Law & Economics working paper ;  |v 2nd ser., no. 256. 
856 4 0 |u http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/files/256_1.pdf 
856 4 0 |u http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=811544 
903 |a HeVa 
999 f f |i 6e3cea6d-7645-5ce9-af48-a347c6b0a924  |s bdb6df16-7413-5571-955c-43caa5e47414 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |a XXKZ3160.P67 I58 2005  |l Online  |c UC-FullText  |u http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/files/256_1.pdf  |g ebooks 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |a XXKZ3160.P67 I58 2005  |l Online  |c UC-FullText  |u http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=811544  |g ebooks