Hot coffee : is justice being served? /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Imprint:[United States] : Docurama Films : New Video, c2011.
Description:1 videodisc (86 min.) : sd., col. ; 4 3/4 in.
Language:English
Subject:
Format: DVD Video
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/8528053
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Varying Form of Title:Hot coffee
Other authors / contributors:Franken, Al
Grisham, John.
Hugo, Carly, 1984-
Oxman, Alan.
Saladoff, Susan.
Docurama (Firm)
HBO Documentary Films.
If Not Now Productions.
Group Entertainment (Firm)
New Video Group.
ISBN:1422973190
9781422973196
Notes:Includes: deleted scenes, interview with the director, and trailer.
Al Franken, John Grisham.
DVD, Dolby digital stereo., NTSC.
Summary:Analyzes and discuses so called "frivolous law suits" and the impact of tort reform on the United States judicial system. Discusses several cases and relates each to tort reform in the U.S.: Liebeck v. McDonald's Restaurants (public relations campaign to instigate tort reform); Colin Gourley's malpractice lawsuit and caps on damages; the prosecution of Mississippi Justice Oliver Diaz and judicial elections; Jamie Leigh Jones v. Halliburton Co. and mandatory arbitration. Exposes how corporations spent millions on a propaganda campaign to distort Americans' view of lawsuits, forever changing the civil justice system. From the infamous case of the woman who sued McDonalds over spilled coffee to the saga of the Mississippi Supreme Court Justice deemed 'not corporate enough' by business interests, this program tears apart the conventional wisdom about 'frivolous lawsuits.'
Standard no.:767685253335
Publisher's no.:253331 Docurama Films
Review by Library Journal Review

Not only does this video set the record straight on the widely misunderstood court case concerning the woman who in 1992 was seriously burned by a cup of McDonald's coffee, but it also examines several less notorious but no less devastating cases and uses them all as a platform for a discussion of the tort reform movement. The injured parties and family representatives relate their stories, while legal and medical experts discuss the injuries, evidence, and legal procedures. Filmmaker and former attorney Saladoff skillfully incorporates poignant cases that illustrate the often unjust effects of such reform measures as damage caps and mandatory arbitration contract clauses on the rights of victims. She inserts on-the-street interviews with average citizens to reveal common misconceptions about tort reform, while appearances by Sen. Al Franken and author/lawyer John Grisham help to explain the issues and add celebrity power. The film raises questions about the motives and activities of the American Tort Reform Association and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The graphic footage of the burns in the McDonald's case is necessary to put to rest the notion that the victim was simply greedy. Bonus features include an insightful look at how the politically charged language of tort reform was crafted to influence opinion. VERDICT This well-made film goes beyond advocacy group sound bites and provides an intelligible analysis of what tort reform means to consumers, victims, and public figures; it will appeal to consumer protection groups, the legal community, and general audiences interested in protecting their legal rights.-Joan Pedzich, formerly with Harris Beach PLLC, Pittsford, NY (c) Copyright 2012. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Review by Library Journal Review