Writing in the sciences : exploring conventions of scientific discourse /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Penrose, Ann M.
Edition:2nd ed.
Imprint:New York : Longman, c2004.
Description:xiv, 448 p. : ill., maps ; 24 cm.
Language:English
Series:The Allyn and Bacon series in technical communication
Allyn and Bacon series in technical communication.
Subject:Technical writing.
Technical writing.
Format: Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/5170640
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:Katz, Steven B., 1953-
ISBN:0321112040 (pbk.)
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (p. 425-435) and indexes.
Table of Contents:
  • Preface
  • List of stylistic features
  • I. Scientific Conventions
  • 1. Science as a Social Enterprise
  • 1.1. The shaping of knowledge in science
  • 1.2. The social nature of science
  • 1.3. The centrality of communication in science
  • 1.4. The role of persuasion in scientific communication
  • 1.5. Scientific communication and convention
  • 1.6. The role of collaboration in scientific communication
  • 2. Forums for Communication in Science
  • 2.1. The socialization process: Entering a new community
  • 2.2. Research journals and their readers
  • 2.3. Research conferences and professional associations
  • 2.4. Research proposals and their audiences
  • 2.5. Communicating beyond the research community
  • 2.6. Electronic communication in science
  • 3. Reading and Writing Research Reports
  • 3.1. Argumentation in science
  • 3.2. The logic(s) of scientific inquiry
  • 3.3. Introducing the research problem
  • 3.4. Describing methods
  • 3.5. Reporting results
  • 3.6. Discussing trends and implications
  • 3.7. The research report abstract
  • 3.8. Brief report genres: Research letters and notes
  • 3.9. How scientists write reports
  • 3.10. How scientists read reports
  • 3.11. How reviewers evaluate reports
  • 4. Reviewing Prior Research
  • 4.1. The role of prior research in scientific argument
  • 4.2. Reviewing as a genre: The review article
  • 4.3. Locating the literature
  • 4.4. Reading previous research
  • 4.5. Identifying trends and patterns
  • 4.6. Organizing the review
  • 4.7. Citing sources in the text
  • 4.8. Preparing the list of works cited
  • 4.9. The research review abstract
  • 5. Preparing Conference Presentations
  • 5.1. The role of research conferences in the sciences
  • 5.2. Writing conference proposal abstracts
  • 5.3. Organizing the research talk
  • 5.4. Methods of oral presentation
  • 5.5. Delivering conference presentations
  • 5.6. The use of graphics in oral presentations
  • 5.7. Preparing research posters
  • 6. Writing Research Proposals
  • 6.1. The role of the proposal in science
  • 6.2. Multiple audiences of the proposal
  • 6.3. Logic and organization in the research proposal
  • 6.4. Introducing the research problem and objectives
  • 6.5. Providing background
  • 6.6. Describing proposed methods
  • 6.7. The research proposal abstract
  • 6.8. How scientists write research proposals
  • 6.9. How reviewers evaluate research proposals
  • 6.10. Accountability in the research process
  • 7. Documenting Procedures and Guidelines
  • 7.1. Audiences and purposes in industry and government
  • 7.2. General principles for writing instructions
  • 7.3. Developing procedures for quality assurance
  • 7.4. Documenting procedures for regulatory purposes
  • 7.5. Documenting procedures for commercial application
  • 7.6. Procedures as public policy
  • 7.7. Procedures as public ethos
  • 8. Communicating Science in the Public Realm
  • 8.1. Why do scientists communicate with public audiences?
  • 8.2. Understanding "general" audiences
  • 8.3. Adapting through narration
  • 8.4. Adapting through examples
  • 8.5. Adapting through definition
  • 8.6. Adapting through analysis
  • 8.7. Adapting through comparison
  • 8.8. Adapting through graphics
  • 8.9. Logic and organization in writing for public audiences
  • 9. Considering Ethics in Scientific Communication
  • 9.1. Scientific and social ethics
  • 9.2. The question of authorship
  • 9.3. Scientific communication as moral responsibility
  • 9.4. Scientific communication and public communication: An ethical conflict?
  • 9.5. Scientific style and social responsibility
  • 9.6. The ethics of style as socialization
  • II. Sample Research Cases
  • 10. Research on the "Ulcer Bug:" From Theory to Clinical Application
  • Marshall and Warren and Colleagues