Death, desire, and loss in Western culture /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Dollimore, Jonathan.
Imprint:New York : Routledge, 1998.
Description:xxxii, 384 p. ; 24 cm.
Language:English
Subject:
Format: Print Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/3432546
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:0415921740 (alk. paper)
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (p. 356-374) and index.
Review by Choice Review

In his most ambitious book to date, Dollimore traces the intersection of desire and death in Western culture. He argues that Western metaphysics has reduced that which can be experienced to the world of mere appearances--as opposed to a realm of abstract and universal truths. Thus life itself is defined as a sense of distance from what truly is. The desire to overcome this sense of loss engenders the notion of the pleasurable death of the self--what Dollimore terms "self-disidentification." While occasionally frustrating--one worries about a nine-page chapter that covers Heidegger, Koj`eve, and Sartre--Dollimore's study is on the whole exhilarating and thought-provoking. Ranging from the ancient Greeks to current debates about AIDS, he consistently makes connections that are unexpected and illuminating. Many studies of this genre are bloated with an apocalyptic self-righteousness that guarantees they will only appeal to the converted. Yet with Dollimore, refreshingly, one is constantly aware that this is an intellectually serious undertaking. This will be an important book for all those engaged in cultural criticism. Highly recommended for upper-division undergraduates through faculty, and for general readers. S. Barnett; Central Connecticut State University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Booklist Review

The German thinker Arthur Schopenhauer once said that "without death there would hardly have been any philosophizing." Dollimore attests to this thought in his engaging study of death and its corresponding link to desire. In presenting funereal discourses of thinkers, writers, poets, and other literati throughout the ages, he offers a substantial contribution to Western intellectual history. As he examines the conversations between philosophers and writers, beginning with the pre-Socratics and finishing with postmodern theorists, his findings prove interesting--death has always been linked to desire in Western culture. He touches upon the work of almost every conceivable thinker: Heraclitus and Camille Paglia, Machiavelli and Marx, Shakespeare and Wagner, and, of course, the venerable Foucault. He concludes with a study of homoeroticism and AIDS, perhaps the most poignant modern example of desire linked with death. Although a little shaky on facts that are not within his usual academic milieu, and despite some antiquated bibliographic sources, Dollimore presents a marvelous, enrapturing, and accessible work for both the scholar and the armchair philosopher. --Michael Spinella

From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Review by Publisher's Weekly Review

In his prodigiously intelligent, deeply challenging and ultimately rewarding book, Dollimore (Sexual Dissidence) argues that the death/desire dynamic, while banefully associated in recent times with AIDS, is not a new or alternate phenomenon but was crucial in the formation of Western culture. In chapter after chapter, inspired, finely honed analysis of canonical works of philosophy, fiction, drama and more shows how early civilization's ambiguous ideas about death repeat themselves and shape gender and identity. In the Renaissance, for example, death was fused with desire via the concept of mutability and its inherent paradox. To put it simply, if man loves most what is fleeting (especially beauty, which will eventually fade), then will his desire always be unfulfilled. Similarly, Socrates, accused of corrupting the youth of Athens, willingly takes the poison that kills him and his cravings while "the sun is still on the mountains," putting a strange twist to Seneca's carpe diem. Since Dollimore's analysis is structured by intellectual trends rather than by era, there is a dizzying effecthere, and one begins to wonder what kind of "non-specialist" reader the author has in mind, particularly given the density of many of the thinkers he takes on. Yet his hopeful conclusion works toward a way out of the death/desire rubric with convincing passion. (Oct.) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved

(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Review by Choice Review


Review by Booklist Review


Review by Publisher's Weekly Review