Before Utopia : the making of Thomas More's mind /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Dealy, Ross, author.
Imprint:Toronto ; Buffalo ; London : University of Toronto Press, [020]
Description:1 online resource
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/12872421
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9781487534486
1487534485
9781487506599
1487506597
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Print version record.
Summary:"This unique study considers the influences of Stoic critics on the evolution of Thomas More's thought. The author argues that More's engaement with Erasmus's work radicalized his understanding of Christianity and shaped the writing of Utopia."--
Other form:Print version: Dealy, Ross. Before Utopia. Toronto ; Buffalo ; London : University of Toronto Press, 2019 9781487506599
Review by Choice Review

This original, densely written study seeks to understand how Thomas More (1478--1535) came "to embrace and represent a particular way of thinking" (p. 3). Dealy (ret., St. John's Univ., NY) argues that More had wrestled with the claims of contemplative life, urged on by the religiously minded and the active life that attracted him, but that his doubts were resolved by the Stoic philosophy expressed in the works of his friend Erasmus and in Cicero's Paradoxa Stoicorum. More ultimately embraced a Christianity that was both worldly and nonworldly, a both/and rather than an either/or. In this view More's great book, Utopia, was not an exercise in humanist rhetoric but a "programmatic" work of philosophy. The debate between More and the fictional character Hythloday in Utopia is thus understood as a confrontation that requires reconciliation. In the conclusion Dealy writes that by 1516 "More had come to see Christianity in terms of the unitary two-dimensional outlook at the heart of ancient Stoicism." In the final chapter, he reinvents the very meaning of Utopia: it was a way of solving problems rather than a "conglomeration of more of less ideal practices, customs and institutions." Dealy skillfully disposes of interpretations presented by other scholars. Summing Up: Recommended. Graduate students, researchers, faculty. --Douglas R. Bisson, Belmont University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review