|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a2200000Ki 4500 |
| 001 |
12683271 |
| 006 |
m o d |
| 007 |
cr cnu---unuuu |
| 008 |
211029s2021 enk o 000 0 eng d |
| 005 |
20230326164437.1 |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 9781009004794
|q electronic book
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 1009004794
|q electronic book
|
| 020 |
|
|
|z 1009001396
|
| 020 |
|
|
|z 9781009001397
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)1281193886
|
| 035 |
|
9 |
|a (OCLCCM-CC)1281193886
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a YDX
|b eng
|e rda
|c YDX
|d CAMBR
|d SFB
|d EBLCP
|d OCLCF
|d OCLCO
|
| 049 |
|
|
|a MAIN
|
| 050 |
|
4 |
|a K840
|b .H65 2021
|
| 090 |
|
|
|a XXK840
|b .H65 2021
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Holden, Richard T.,
|d 1974-
|e author.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2007131798
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Can blockchain solve the hold-up problem in contracts? /
|c Richard Holden, Anup Malani.
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a Cambridge, United Kingdom ;
|a New York, NY :
|b Cambridge University Press,
|c 2021.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a 1 online resource.
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a computer
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a online resource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 490 |
0 |
|
|a Cambridge elements. Elements in law, economics and politics
|
| 588 |
|
|
|a Description based on online resource; title from digital title page (viewed on October 29, 2021).
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a A vexing problem in contract law is modification. Two parties sign a contract but before they fully perform, they modify the contract. Should courts enforce the modified agreement? A private remedy is for the parties to write a contract that is robust to hold-up or that makes the facts relevant to modification verifiable. Provisions accomplishing these ends are renegotiation-design and revelation mechanisms. But implementing them requires commitment power. Conventional contract technologies to ensure commitment - liquidated damages - are disfavored by courts and themselves subject to renegotiation. Smart contracts written on blockchain ledgers offer a solution. We explain the basic economics and legal relevance of these technologies, and we argue that they can implement liquidated damages without courts. We address the hurdles courts may impose to use of smart contracts on blockchain and show that sophisticated parties' ex ante commitment to them may lead courts to allow their use as pre-commitment devices.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Contracts
|x Economic aspects.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a Blockchains (Databases)
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/subjects/sh2016002790
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Blockchains (Databases)
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst01981761
|
| 650 |
|
7 |
|a Contracts
|x Economic aspects.
|2 fast
|0 (OCoLC)fst00876978
|
| 655 |
|
0 |
|a Electronic books.
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Malani, Anup,
|e author.
|0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/no2002015458
|
| 903 |
|
|
|a HeVa
|
| 929 |
|
|
|a oclccm
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|s 5ce32718-72e7-51d7-95cc-93b52f818582
|i 91b6d1f2-fb41-5baf-883d-4730ac0d4023
|
| 928 |
|
|
|t Library of Congress classification
|a XXK840.H65 2021
|l Online
|c UC-FullText
|u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009004794
|z Cambridge University Press
|g ebooks
|i 12773801
|
