Relevance in argumentation /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Walton, Douglas N.
Imprint:Mahwah, N.J. : L. Erlbaum Associates, ©2004.
Description:1 online resource (xvi, 311 pages) : illustrations
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/12010620
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:1410609448
9781410609441
9781135618964
1135618968
0805847596
9780805847598
080584760X
9780805847604
Digital file characteristics:data file
Notes:Includes bibliographical references (pages 289-297) and indexes.
Restrictions unspecified
Electronic reproduction. [Place of publication not identified] : HathiTrust Digital Library, 2010.
Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002. http://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212
English.
digitized 2010 HathiTrust Digital Library committed to preserve
Print version record.
Summary:In Relevance in Argumentation, author Douglas Walton presents a new method for critically evaluating arguments for relevance. This method enables a critic to judge whether a move can be said to be relevant or irrelevant, and is based on case studies of argumentation in which a criticism has been made that an argument, or part of an argument, is irrelevant. The method is laso based on a new theory of relevance that incorporates techniques of argumentation theory, logic and artificial intelligence.
Other form:Print version: Walton, Douglas N. Relevance in argumentation. Mahwah, N.J. : L. Erlbaum Associates, ©2004 0805847596 080584760X
Description
Summary:In Relevance in Argumentation, author Douglas Walton presents a new method for critically evaluating arguments for relevance. This method enables a critic to judge whether a move can be said to be relevant or irrelevant, and is based on case studies of argumentation in which an argument, or part of an argument, has been criticized as irrelevant. Walton's method is based on a new theory of relevance that incorporates techniques of argumentation theory, logic, and artificial intelligence.<br> <br> <br> The work uses a case-study approach with numerous examples of controversial arguments, strategies of attack in argumentation, and fallacies. Walton reviews ordinary cases of irrelevance in argumentation, and uses them as a basis to advance and develop his new theory of irrelevance and relevance. The volume also presents a clear account of the technical problems in the previous attempts to define relevance, including an analysis of formal systems of relevance logic and an explanation of the Grecian notion of conversational relevance.<br> <br> <br> This volume is intended for graduate and advanced undergraduate courses in those fields using argumentation theory--especially philosophy, linguistics, cognitive science and communication studies, in addition to argumentation. The work also has practical use, as it applies theory directly to familiar examples of argumentation in daily and professional life. With a clear and comprehensive method for determining relevance and irrelevance, it can be convincingly applied to highly significant practical problems about relevance, including those in legal and political argumentation.<br>
Physical Description:1 online resource (xvi, 311 pages) : illustrations
Format:Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002.
Bibliography:Includes bibliographical references (pages 289-297) and indexes.
ISBN:1410609448
9781410609441
9781135618964
1135618968
0805847596
9780805847598
080584760X
9780805847604