Firm-Specific Shocks and Aggregate Volatility /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Yeh, Chen, author.
Imprint:2017.
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017
Description:1 electronic resource (124 pages)
Language:English
Format: E-Resource Dissertations
Local Note:School code: 0330
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11715123
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:University of Chicago. degree granting institution.
ISBN:9780355079265
Notes:Advisors: Lars P. Hansen; Chad Syverson Committee members: Ufuk Akcigit.
Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A.
English
Summary:This dissertation examines the quantitative importance of firm-specific shocks on aggregate volatility. Firm-specific shocks to the largest firms can directly contribute to aggregate fluctuations whenever the firm size distribution is fat-tailed giving rise to the granular hypothesis. The first section of this dissertation identifies the variation in U.S. aggregate sales that can be explained by firm-level idiosyncratic shocks on the one hand and macro-sectoral forces on the other. By using a novel, comprehensive data set compiled from administrative sources that contains the universe of firms and trade transactions, I find that the granular hypothesis accounts at most for 16 percent of the variation in aggregate sales growth. This is about half of that found by previous studies that imposed Gibrat's law where all firms are equally volatile regardless of their size.
The second section focuses on the underlying reason for the apparent discrepancy between the results found in this dissertation and the previous literature. I argue that the relatively small role of granularity in the U.S. economy can be entirely rationalized by accounting for the negative power law relationship between firm-level volatility and size, i.e. the size-variance relationship. Using the full distribution of growth rates among U.S. firms, I find robust evidence of such a relationship between firm-level volatility and size. The largest firms, whose shocks are most prominent for the granular channel, are the least volatile under the size-variance relationship, thus their influence on aggregates is mitigated. I show that by taking this relationship into account the effect of firm-specific shocks on observed macroeconomic volatility is substantially reduced.
The last part of this dissertation investigates several plausible mechanisms that could explain the negative size-variance relationship. After empirically ruling out some of them, I suggest a "market power" channel in which large firms face smaller price elasticities and therefore respond less to a given-sized productivity shock than small firms do. I provide direct evidence for this mechanism by estimating demand elasticities among U.S. manufactures. Furthermore, this channel is consistent with the observation that markups are increasing in size. The results of a structural estimation procedure indicate that this is indeed the case for U.S. manufactures. Lastly, these robust empirical findings can be rationalized in an analytically tractable framework featuring random growth and a Kimball demand aggregator.
LEADER 04873ntm a22004693i 4500
001 11715123
005 20170926110231.5
007 cr un|---|||||
008 170926s2017 miu|||||om |||||||eng d
003 ICU
020 |a 9780355079265 
035 |a (MiAaPQD)AAI10282110 
035 |a (OCoLC)1078447413 
035 |a AAI10282110 
040 |a MiAaPQD  |b eng  |c MiAaPQD  |e rda 
100 1 |a Yeh, Chen,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Firm-Specific Shocks and Aggregate Volatility /  |c Chen Yeh. 
260 |c 2017. 
264 1 |a Ann Arbor :   |b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,   |c 2017 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (124 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/contentTypes/txt 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/mediaTypes/c 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier  |0 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/carriers/cr 
500 |a Advisors: Lars P. Hansen; Chad Syverson Committee members: Ufuk Akcigit. 
502 |b Ph.D.  |c University of Chicago, Division of the Social Sciences, Department of Economics  |d 2017. 
510 4 |a Dissertation Abstracts International,   |c Volume: 78-12(E), Section: A. 
520 |a This dissertation examines the quantitative importance of firm-specific shocks on aggregate volatility. Firm-specific shocks to the largest firms can directly contribute to aggregate fluctuations whenever the firm size distribution is fat-tailed giving rise to the granular hypothesis. The first section of this dissertation identifies the variation in U.S. aggregate sales that can be explained by firm-level idiosyncratic shocks on the one hand and macro-sectoral forces on the other. By using a novel, comprehensive data set compiled from administrative sources that contains the universe of firms and trade transactions, I find that the granular hypothesis accounts at most for 16 percent of the variation in aggregate sales growth. This is about half of that found by previous studies that imposed Gibrat's law where all firms are equally volatile regardless of their size. 
520 |a The second section focuses on the underlying reason for the apparent discrepancy between the results found in this dissertation and the previous literature. I argue that the relatively small role of granularity in the U.S. economy can be entirely rationalized by accounting for the negative power law relationship between firm-level volatility and size, i.e. the size-variance relationship. Using the full distribution of growth rates among U.S. firms, I find robust evidence of such a relationship between firm-level volatility and size. The largest firms, whose shocks are most prominent for the granular channel, are the least volatile under the size-variance relationship, thus their influence on aggregates is mitigated. I show that by taking this relationship into account the effect of firm-specific shocks on observed macroeconomic volatility is substantially reduced. 
520 |a The last part of this dissertation investigates several plausible mechanisms that could explain the negative size-variance relationship. After empirically ruling out some of them, I suggest a "market power" channel in which large firms face smaller price elasticities and therefore respond less to a given-sized productivity shock than small firms do. I provide direct evidence for this mechanism by estimating demand elasticities among U.S. manufactures. Furthermore, this channel is consistent with the observation that markups are increasing in size. The results of a structural estimation procedure indicate that this is indeed the case for U.S. manufactures. Lastly, these robust empirical findings can be rationalized in an analytically tractable framework featuring random growth and a Kimball demand aggregator. 
546 |a English 
590 |a School code: 0330 
690 |a Economics. 
710 2 |a University of Chicago.  |e degree granting institution.  |0 http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n79058404  |1 http://viaf.org/viaf/143657677 
720 1 |a Lars P. Hansen  |e degree supervisor. 
720 1 |a Chad Syverson  |e degree supervisor. 
856 4 0 |u http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:10282110  |y ProQuest 
856 4 0 |u https://dx.doi.org/10.6082/M1GQ6VV7  |y Knowledge@UChicago 
903 |a HeVa 
929 |a eresource 
999 f f |i c6291bcd-c86a-54c3-86b8-7e5410eae73d  |s 8c94e228-067a-5fab-a000-0be1640cd1ab 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |l Online  |c UC-FullText  |u http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:10282110  |z ProQuest  |g ebooks  |i 11159268 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |l Online  |c UC-FullText  |u https://dx.doi.org/10.6082/M1GQ6VV7  |z Knowledge@UChicago  |g ebooks  |i 11159269