Funerary practices and political succession: Three regime types /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Ford, Joseph A., author.
Imprint:2016.
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016
Description:1 electronic resource (189 pages)
Language:English
Format: E-Resource Dissertations
Local Note:School code: 0330
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11674584
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:University of Chicago. degree granting institution.
ISBN:9781339874159
Notes:Includes supplementary digital materials.
Advisors: John J. Mearsheimer Committee members: Charles Lipson; Nathan Tarcov.
Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-12(E), Section: A.
English
Summary:This dissertation argues that political succession occurring on the death of a ruler requires a special form of legitimation. Under such circumstances funerary practices are structured so as to argue in favor of the legitimacy of the transfer of power. This is done by the use of lavish obsequies and forms of interment that extol the virtue of the deceased and seek to associate the new ruler with the predecessor. Such funerary practices are a type of argument that convey clear political messages to society and even to specific discreet groups within society.
In addition, a comparison of the funerary practices of the political elite to those of the rest of society allows for a clear determination of how elite death practices differ from those of the populous at large and why this takes on political saliency. The theoretical model of this process is a modified version of Easton's (1965) model of political legitimation. My model emphasizes how regimes utilize personal attributes of rulers, either real or imagined, to legitimate both future rulers and the regime as a whole. This shows the connections among the regime itself, the main figures in the regime, and popular approval.
While the literature indicates that elections are a key to legitimating transfers of power in modern democratic republics it is less clear how this is achieved when vacancy follows the death of a high official. The nature of political succession upon death is more important in these cases than the exact form of regime. As a result, the legitimation of succession upon the death of a ruler in office is pursued in part by use of funerary practices regardless of regime type.

MARC

LEADER 00000ntm a22000003i 4500
001 11674584
005 20160919114620.5
006 m o d
007 cr un|---|||||
008 160919s2016 miu|||||om |||||||eng d
003 ICU
020 |a 9781339874159 
035 |a (MiAaPQD)AAI10129524 
040 |a MiAaPQD  |b eng  |c MiAaPQD  |e rda 
100 1 |a Ford, Joseph A.,  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Funerary practices and political succession: Three regime types /  |c Ford, Joseph A. 
260 |c 2016. 
264 1 |a Ann Arbor :   |b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,   |c 2016 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (189 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Includes supplementary digital materials. 
500 |a Advisors: John J. Mearsheimer Committee members: Charles Lipson; Nathan Tarcov. 
502 |b Ph.D.  |c University of Chicago, Division of the Social Sciences, Department of Political Science  |d 2016. 
510 4 |a Dissertation Abstracts International,   |c Volume: 77-12(E), Section: A. 
520 |a This dissertation argues that political succession occurring on the death of a ruler requires a special form of legitimation. Under such circumstances funerary practices are structured so as to argue in favor of the legitimacy of the transfer of power. This is done by the use of lavish obsequies and forms of interment that extol the virtue of the deceased and seek to associate the new ruler with the predecessor. Such funerary practices are a type of argument that convey clear political messages to society and even to specific discreet groups within society. 
520 |a In addition, a comparison of the funerary practices of the political elite to those of the rest of society allows for a clear determination of how elite death practices differ from those of the populous at large and why this takes on political saliency. The theoretical model of this process is a modified version of Easton's (1965) model of political legitimation. My model emphasizes how regimes utilize personal attributes of rulers, either real or imagined, to legitimate both future rulers and the regime as a whole. This shows the connections among the regime itself, the main figures in the regime, and popular approval. 
520 |a While the literature indicates that elections are a key to legitimating transfers of power in modern democratic republics it is less clear how this is achieved when vacancy follows the death of a high official. The nature of political succession upon death is more important in these cases than the exact form of regime. As a result, the legitimation of succession upon the death of a ruler in office is pursued in part by use of funerary practices regardless of regime type. 
546 |a English 
590 |a School code: 0330 
690 |a Political science. 
710 2 |a University of Chicago.  |e degree granting institution. 
720 1 |a John J. Mearsheimer  |e degree supervisor. 
856 4 0 |u http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:10129524  |y ProQuest 
856 4 0 |u https://dx.doi.org/10.6082/M1057CVZ  |y Knowledge@UChicago 
035 |a AAI10129524 
929 |a eresource 
999 f f |i ea9255b3-d9db-5090-8324-23ce42eef346  |s 5b511551-ce7f-5e06-b637-8054a3dd9457 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |l Online  |c UC-FullText  |u http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:10129524  |z ProQuest  |g ebooks  |i 11097528 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |l Online  |c UC-FullText  |u https://dx.doi.org/10.6082/M1057CVZ  |z Knowledge@UChicago  |g ebooks  |i 11097529