Upsetting composition commonplaces /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Barnard, Ian, 1960- author.
Imprint:Boulder, Colorado : Utah State University Press, 2014.
©2014
Description:1 online resource (194 pages)
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11348449
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780874219470
0874219477
0874219469
9780874219463
9780874219463
Digital file characteristics:data file
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Print version record.
Summary:In Upsetting Composition Commonplaces, Ian Barnard argues that composition still retains the bulk of instructional practices that were used in the decades before poststructuralist theory discredited them. While acknowledging that some of the foundational insights of poststructuralist theory can be difficult to translate to the classroom, Barnard upends several especially intransigent tenets that continue to influence the teaching of writing and how students are encouraged to understand writing. Using six major principles of writing classrooms and textbooks-clarity, intent, voice, ethnography, a.
Other form:Print version: Barnard, Ian, 1960- Upsetting composition commonplaces. Boulder, Colorado : Utah State University Press, ©2014 x, 181 pages 9780874219463
Review by Choice Review

Barnard (Chapman Univ.; Queer Race, 2004) has established a reputation for questioning common assumptions in the dominant culture and in the academy. In the present title, he challenges current composition pedagogy. He employs post-structuralist theory to challenge standard pedagogical practices. Each chapter is devoted to a single commonplace, including hallowed concepts such as clarity, audience, voice, and objectivity. Barnard's intended readers (specifically, composition instructors, writing program directors, and those who teach composition theory and pedagogy) may not be as invested in post-structuralist tenets as he. And application of some of his suggestions may be problematic because many composition instructors are not free to teach whatever or however they choose and are expected to reinforce ideology of the dominant culture to some degree. That aside, each chapter is carefully reasoned, and the author even mentions the disadvantages of his own approach. Though unlikely to instigate widespread change, Barnard's arguments--especially that concerning conflation of hegemony with universality--are logical and well worth consideration. Versions of several chapters were previously published in scholarly journals. Summing Up: Recommended. Graduate students, researchers, faculty. --Catherine Erin O'Neill Armendarez, New Mexico State University at Alamogordo

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review