Surviving death /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Johnston, Mark, 1954- author.
Imprint:Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, ©2010.
Description:1 online resource (ix. 393 pages, 2 unnumbered pages of plates) : color illustrations
Language:English
Series:Carl G. Hempel Lecture Ser.
Carl G. Hempel Lecture Ser.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11245812
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780691130125
0691130124
9780691130132
0691130132
9781400834600
1400834600
1282936158
9781282936157
9786612936159
6612936150
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
English.
Print version record.
Summary:Johnston presents an argument for a form of immortality that divests the notion of any supernatural elements. The book is packed with illuminating philosophical reflection on the question of what we are, and what it is for us to persist over time.
Other form:Print version: Johnston, Mark, 1954- Surviving death. Princeton : Princeton University Press, ©2010 9780691130125
Standard no.:9786612936159
9780691130132
Review by Choice Review

This sequel to Johnson's natural theology of God in Saving God: Religion after Idolatry (CH, Jan'10, 47-2510) is a dense and sustained yet engaging argument for a new way of understanding how humans can survive death, given that science and contemporary philosophy make some believe that traditional Christian claims about bodily resurrection are implausible. Johnson (Princeton Univ.) engages both constructively and critically many proposals about the relationships between personality, body, and identity. His constructive argument centers on how one should understand that an attitude of agape, namely, an attitude that places the good of others above the survival of one's individual personality (not person), allows an individual to survive death. He postulates that only those who are concerned with the good of others can survive the "onward rush of history." The author admits that this argument will not convince those who hold faith in a biblical account of resurrection, but he does provide readers much to think about. Most readers will be able to follow the book's argument if they read carefully, but a philosophical background is necessary if one wants to fully appreciate its highly technical argumentation. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-level undergraduates through faculty/researchers. A. W. Klink Duke University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review