Fiction agonistes : in defense of literature /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Jusdanis, Gregory, 1955-
Imprint:Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University Press, ©2010.
Description:1 online resource (154 pages)
Language:English
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11234375
Hidden Bibliographic Details
ISBN:9780804768757
0804768757
9780804768764
0804768765
9780804773768
0804773769
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
Restrictions unspecified
Electronic reproduction. [S.l.] : HathiTrust Digital Library, 2011.
Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002. http://purl.oclc.org/DLF/benchrepro0212
digitized 2011 HathiTrust Digital Library committed to preserve
Print version record.
Other form:Print version: Jusdanis, Gregory, 1955- Fiction agonistes. Stanford, Calif. : Stanford University Press, ©2010
Review by Choice Review

Jusdanis (Ohio State Univ.) is disturbed by the failure of those devoted to art to offer "a theory of art relevant to [the present] time." In the first few pages of this brief book, he asks how society has come to undervalue art in general and literature in particular as "a separate [and autonomous] realm of human practice wherein [one] can imagine alternate possibilities" for the world. In the rest of the book, he makes a gallant, articulate attempt to characterize what makes this realm separate and yet highly relevant to the social world. A genuinely learned critic, Jusdanis draws on a range of artists and thinkers: Aristophanes and James Joyce, Thomas Hardy and Milovan Pavic, C. P. Cavafy and Richard Wagner are all used to good effect. Enlarging on arguments first ventured by Sir Philip Sidney, Jusdanis demonstrates the persistent soundness of the paradox that autonomous art remains indispensable because only such art can be public and political. Even when Jusdanis uses terms and concepts such as "parabasis" and "parataxis," his explanations are lucid and his discourse accessible. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Lower-division undergraduates through faculty. K. Tololyan Wesleyan University

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review