Legal rights : historical and philosophical perspectives /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Imprint:Ann Arbor : University of Michigan Press, 1997.
Description:1 online resource
Language:English
Series:The Amherst series in law, jurisprudence, and social thought
Amherst series in law, jurisprudence, and social thought.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Book
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11206850
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:Sarat, Austin.
Kearns, Thomas R.
ISBN:9780472023615
0472023616
1282437755
9781282437753
9786612437755
6612437758
0472106333
9780472084715
0472084712
Notes:Includes bibliographical references and index.
English.
Print version record.
Summary:The idea of legal rights today enjoys virtually universal appeal, yet all too often the meaning and significance of rights are poorly understood. The purpose of this volume is to clarify the subject of legal rights by drawing on both historical and philosophical legal scholarship to bridge the gap between these two genres--a gap that has divorced abstract and normative treatments of rights from an understanding of their particular social and cultural contexts. Legal Rights: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives shows that the meaning and extent of rights has been dramatically expanded in.
Other form:Print version: Legal rights. Ann Arbor, Mich. : University of Michigan Press, ©1996 0472106333
Review by Choice Review

This edited collection of essays originally presented at an Amherst College Conference in November of 1992 may be another example of a growing trend, perhaps motivated by the "publish or perish" syndrome that academics are increasingly tyrannized by, and presents some difficulty for the reviewer. The essays attempt to look at rights from a philosophical and historical standpoint, hence range from a historical discussion of Lincoln and slavery to a more esoteric essay by Schlag, who looks at rights within a postmodern context. An essay by Waldron discusses rights from a concept of empowerment that enables people of all classes and groups to put forward their needs or rights as equals. It is striking to note the number of essays in which Ronald Dworkin is cited or may even be the protagonist against whom the writers seem to test their arguments. The Perry essay looks at human rights and religious belief, and seems to suggest that human rights based on the notion of human dignity cannot be detached from some belief in a supreme being, although such a belief need not be tied to any established religion. A thoughtful and stimulating contribution to the literature of human rights. For academic readers, all levels. E. W. Webking University of Lethbridge

Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.
Review by Choice Review