The double redaction of the Deuteronomistic history /
Saved in:
Summary: | Martin Noth argued that in the books of Joshua-Kings could be seen the work of a single, purposeful author or historian-a hypothesis which, although close to becoming one of those rare 'assured results of critical scholarship', has recently encountered criticism. Nelson observes that Noth's historian has a 'disturbing tendency to fall apart in the hands of those who work with him'. In this comprehensive study of the question, he attempts to put on a solid critical foundation the increasingly popular theory that the Deutoronomistic History is a product of a two-stage literary process. |
---|---|
Item Description: | Originally presented as the author's thesis (Th. D.--Union Theological Seminary, Richmond, Va., 1973). |
Physical Description: | 1 online resource (185 pages). |
Format: | Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002. |
Bibliography: | Includes bibliographical references (pages 151-166) and indexes. |
ISBN: | 9780567270191 056727019X 9780905774336 0905774337 0905774343 |
ISSN: | 0309-0787 ; |