Clinical trials on trial : how should the FDA do its job? /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Epstein, Richard Allen, 1943- author.
Imprint:Chicago, Illinois : Law School, University of Chicago, May 2, 2011.
Description:1 online resource (video file) (1 hr., 3 mins., 39 secs.)
Language:English
Series:Chicago's best ideas
Chicago's best ideas.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Video
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/11014199
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:University of Chicago. Law School, hosting institution.
Notes:Recorded May 2, 2011.
Descption based on online resource; title from title screen (April 6, 2017).
Summary:"One of the major functions of the FDA is to check new drugs for their safety and effectiveness. The chief tool for doing this has been the double-blind clinical trial. Over the past 20 years ago, the requirements for these trials have become ever more stringent, reducing the probability that new chemical entities will be approved, delaying their onset into the market, and increasing their costs. The FDA claims that these stark measures are needed to discharge its chief function of consumer protection. In this talk, Professor Epstein disputes that contention, to argue that many of the FDA standards are analytically unsound and socially counterproductive. The constant demand for compassionate exemptions on the one hand, and widespread off-label use of approved drugs are clear signs that the current system is out of whack and in need of serious recalibration ... This talk was recorded May 2, 2011 as part of the Chicago's Best Ideas lecture series."--Law School faculty podcast webpage.
Other form:Audio