The evolutionary history of Hox gene expression in vertebrate appendages /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Gehrke, Andrew Reece, author.
Imprint:2016.
Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016
Description:1 electronic resource (96 pages)
Language:English
Format: E-Resource Dissertations
Local Note:School code: 0330
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/10862844
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:University of Chicago. degree granting institution.
ISBN:9781339872728
Notes:Advisors: Neil H. Shubin Committee members: Robert Ho; Marcelo Nobrega; Ilya Ruvinsky.
Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-10(E), Section: B.
English
Summary:The era of genomics has profoundly aided our understanding of the genetic changes responsible for generating diversity of metazoan form. In contrast, access to a plethora of genomes (and developmental biology in the embryos they control) has further muddled the concept of homology. Morphologically disparate animals utilize the same core genetic toolkit during development, meaning that the same genes are utilized to form vastly different structures among taxa. Did these gene activities arise due to common ancestry, or did they arrive independently? In essence, how do we determine whether a genetic program in two individuals is homologous, or convergent?
This thesis attempts to answer this fundamental question using the fin to limb transition as a model paradigm. The pattern of activity of key genes (specifically Hox) that build the pectoral fins of fish and the limbs of tetrapods are extremely similar, yet the morphology of fins and limbs are very different. Did the common ancestor of fish and tetrapods contain this genetic program (homology), or were they invented separately in each group (convergence)? Here, I use comparative regulatory architecture as a foothold to elucidate this question, as homologous expression patterns are likely to utilize homologous regulatory elements.
Through comparative epigenomics, sequence analysis, and functional experiments, I find that fish utilize the same overall enhancer landscapes in the development of fins as the limbs of tetrapods. Thus, the genetic program that builds fins and limbs (Hox) were present and functional in the common ancestor of fish and tetrapods, implying concrete evidence for homology between specific segments in fins and limbs. Finally, I provide functional evidence to suggest that tetrapod digits and the fin rays of fish are built using a homologous population of cells, calling into question traditional views of the evolution of the wrist and digits.

MARC

LEADER 00000ntm a22000003i 4500
001 10862844
003 ICU
005 20161130120316.3
006 m o d
007 cr un|---|||||
008 160729s2016 miu|||||om |||||||eng d
020 |a 9781339872728 
035 |a (MiAaPQD)AAI10129381 
035 |a AAI10129381 
040 |a MiAaPQD  |b eng  |c MiAaPQD  |e rda 
100 1 |a Gehrke, Andrew Reece,  |e author. 
245 1 4 |a The evolutionary history of Hox gene expression in vertebrate appendages /  |c Gehrke, Andrew Reece. 
260 |c 2016. 
264 1 |a Ann Arbor :  |b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses,  |c 2016 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (96 pages) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Advisors: Neil H. Shubin Committee members: Robert Ho; Marcelo Nobrega; Ilya Ruvinsky. 
502 |b Ph.D.  |c University of Chicago, Division of the Biological Sciences, Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy  |d 2016. 
510 4 |a Dissertation Abstracts International,  |c Volume: 77-10(E), Section: B. 
520 |a The era of genomics has profoundly aided our understanding of the genetic changes responsible for generating diversity of metazoan form. In contrast, access to a plethora of genomes (and developmental biology in the embryos they control) has further muddled the concept of homology. Morphologically disparate animals utilize the same core genetic toolkit during development, meaning that the same genes are utilized to form vastly different structures among taxa. Did these gene activities arise due to common ancestry, or did they arrive independently? In essence, how do we determine whether a genetic program in two individuals is homologous, or convergent? 
520 |a This thesis attempts to answer this fundamental question using the fin to limb transition as a model paradigm. The pattern of activity of key genes (specifically Hox) that build the pectoral fins of fish and the limbs of tetrapods are extremely similar, yet the morphology of fins and limbs are very different. Did the common ancestor of fish and tetrapods contain this genetic program (homology), or were they invented separately in each group (convergence)? Here, I use comparative regulatory architecture as a foothold to elucidate this question, as homologous expression patterns are likely to utilize homologous regulatory elements. 
520 |a Through comparative epigenomics, sequence analysis, and functional experiments, I find that fish utilize the same overall enhancer landscapes in the development of fins as the limbs of tetrapods. Thus, the genetic program that builds fins and limbs (Hox) were present and functional in the common ancestor of fish and tetrapods, implying concrete evidence for homology between specific segments in fins and limbs. Finally, I provide functional evidence to suggest that tetrapod digits and the fin rays of fish are built using a homologous population of cells, calling into question traditional views of the evolution of the wrist and digits. 
546 |a English 
590 |a School code: 0330 
690 |a Genetics. 
690 |a Evolution & development. 
710 2 |a University of Chicago.  |e degree granting institution. 
720 1 |a Neil H. Shubin  |e degree supervisor. 
856 4 0 |u http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:10129381  |y ProQuest 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.6082/M12B8VZT  |y Knowledge@UChicago 
929 |a eresource 
999 f f |i dd258f8c-0289-5aea-b008-7636779cda55  |s 49b57d45-f66d-5b2a-a147-f758c3a6c657 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |l Online  |c UC-FullText  |u http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqm&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:10129381  |z ProQuest  |g ebooks  |i 9266942 
928 |t Library of Congress classification  |l Online  |c UC-FullText  |u http://dx.doi.org/10.6082/M12B8VZT  |z Knowledge@UChicago  |g ebooks  |i 9371509