Does the Constitution always mean what it says? /

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Author / Creator:Strauss, David A., author.
Imprint:Chicago, Illinois : Law School, University of Chicago, Feb. 6, 2014.
Description:1 online resource (video file) (55 mins., 41 secs. )
Language:English
Series:Chicago's best ideas
Chicago's best ideas.
Subject:
Format: E-Resource Video
URL for this record:http://pi.lib.uchicago.edu/1001/cat/bib/10818142
Hidden Bibliographic Details
Other authors / contributors:University of Chicago. Law School, host institution.
Notes:Recorded Feb. 6, 2014.
Descption based on online resource; title from title screen (Aug. 5, 2016).
Summary:"The U.S. Constitution is "the supreme Law of the Land." Of course some of its provisions are vague and must be interpreted. But when the Constitution says something clearly, we follow it. Don't we? Actually things are not that simple. There are several important examples of clear language in the Constitution that we do not follow. (For an example, look at the first word of the First Amendment.) Sometimes, in fact, it would be essentially unthinkable to follow the most obvious meaning of apparently clear language. These are not just slips of the pen by the Framers of the Constitution. Things are more interesting than that: the Framers made deliberate choices that we do not always accept, even though those choices are reflected in the text. The ways in which we ignore apparently clear language in the Constitution can teach us a lot about how American constitutional law actually works. This talk was recorded on February 26, 2014, as part of the Chicago's Best Ideas Lecture Series."--UChicagoLaw SoundCloud webpage.
Other form:Audio